See also: IRC log
Apple Mike Ballantyne AT&T Mark Jones BEA Dave Orchard CA Igor Sedukhin Carnegie-Mel Katia Sycara Chevron-Tex Roger Cutler Cisco Sandeep Kumar Contivo Dave Hollander Daimler-Chry Mario Jeckle France Telco Shishir Garg HP Zulah Eckert IBM Heather Kreger IBM Chris Ferris Iona Eric Newcomer Ipedeo Srinivas Pandrangi Ipdedo Alex Cheng Mitre Paul Denning Nokia Mike Mahan Nortel Abbie Barbir Oracle Jeff Michinsky Progress Colleen Evans Sun Doug Bunting Sun Geoff Arnold SAP Sinisa Zimek SeeBeyond Ugo Corda Software AG Mike Champion Thompson Hao He Tibco Don Mullen Toshiba Frank McCabe WW Grainger Daniel Austin WW Grainger Tom Caroll W3C Hugo Haas W3C David Booth
BEA Duane Nickull Boeing Gerald Edgar EDS Waqar Sadiq HP YinLeng Husband Oracle Martin Chapman Sybase Himagiri Mukkamala Tibco Scott V. WebMethods Prasad Yendluri
Chair: Mike Champion
Scribe: Shishir Garg
<hugo> Alex is Alex Cheng?
... well, that's the only Alex we have
<chrisf> hello, I'll be a couple minutes late dialing in... just finishing up another call
<scribe_sg> DonMullen: Talk about DaveOrchard's
suggestion regarding MEPs
... Katia will send minutes from last conf. to entire W3C-ws-arch
list
... Heather will update us on MTF and OASIS Management TC
... Mark AI: Summarize the MTF - Done
... ACTION: Frank Eric Katia Zuah to do refactoring of WSA
document
... ACTION: Hugo to do Glossary - missing definitions from document
in Glossary
... ACTION: Daniel to do Glossary terms update from requirements
documents
... ACTION: DaveO to do publish his critique of WS-Desc
document
... ACTION: DavidBooth to do get self added as Editor
... ACTION: Hugo to do add a priori to Glossary
... ACTION: DonMullen DanC to do resolve issue 4
<hugo> Issue 3 email providing pointers: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-wsa-comments/2003Jan/0002.html
<scribe_sg> ACTION: Chairs to do invite P3P group at Plenary
<hugo> Issue 19 email: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-wsa-comments/2003Jan/0001.html
<scribe_sg> ACTION: DaveH to do
summarize bottom-up reliability notes
... ACTION: wsa-members to do all note-takers from break outs to
send notes to W3C-WS-ARCH list
... MikeC sent a unofficial summary from the meeting that was
useful to the group. What was missing from that apart from
break-out summaries?
... DaveH- Need atleast 72 hours before sending anything from
private list to public list
... DaveH - Use a dual banner on such postings: For Member list
only
... TomC - REST MEPs to stay off the list for now?
... DaveH - yes
... UsageScenarios - editors don't think it is not worth keeping
this document active, esp after ongoing refactoring work
... Correction: UsageScenarios - editors think it is not worth
keeping this document active, esp after ongoing refactoring
work
... DaveO - If the UsageScenarios document can be reused then
willing to think about picking it up
... Don- WSDL group looking for a co-ordination point in Arch.
... Roger - Interested in joining a task force to do WSD group
coordination..
... Roger - Usage scenarios is duplicative with a document from
XMLP
... ChrisF - Original Usage Scenarios TF was joint between WSDL and
Arch group.. this has not changed
... Mike - WSD only wants to own description scenarios
... DaveO - that sort of separation is very bad architecturally
... DaveO - Get WSD as editors and to input on new and existing
scenarios and input on SOAP, WSD, MEPs etc.
... ChrisF - Agrees that greater participation is needed
<TomCarrol> The updated issues list is now on the site
<scribe_sg> DaveO - Hugo wrote a travel use case
that can be worked on to incorporate other usage scenarios in that
document
... Roger - Can we find members who can give us actual input on the
travel industry
... Colleen - go to the OTA
... DaveO - It might be too late and also a huge task
... ChrisF - WS-I also has some Usage Scenarios that were discussed
in Washington F2F
... Colleen - Those documents are published now at the WS-I
... DaveO - We have a WS-Choreography WG, and they may need Use
case and Usage scenarios.
... DaveO - A lot of overlap in editors of document and WS-Chor WG
members
... ACTION: Mike to do recruit members to work on Usage Scenarios
Document as co-editor
... Hugo - Glossary clean-up done at breakout at last F2F
... Hugo - definition of loose-coupling from Hao to be done
... Hugo - Concerned about getting Architecture document in sync
with the Glossary
... Katia - WSD defines "Web services" different from WSA; WSA
version is better
... Hugo - WSD requirements document differentiates a collection of
endpoints from a service
... ACTION: Hugo to do contact WSD document editor and resolve this
issue
... Katia - Service has to be a generalization of a Web service
... MikeC - Next step is to get Arch. document to reference
Glossary and have a consistent set of documents
... WS Arch document refactoring discussion
... Frank - First draft of document is out..
... Frank - each concept is enumerated in a topic map style
... Frank - English text descriptions added where possible
... Frank - relationships are also defined to document
subtleties
... Frank - written formally, not for average reader
... Frank - Tried to capture feature abstration - features as an
architectural concept
... Frank - Arch. document needs to prove that we are meeting the
requirements
... Frank - this will help with readability
... Mike - Any diagrams to help with the document?
... Frank - maybe UML
... Katia - Needs to be more mature before any public
discussion
... general agreement as long as private list discussion is
short
... Katia - and Frank planned to discuss one-on-one before sharing
with group
... Hugo - public list primary forum for technical discussion
... Zulah - More a process question. No need to discuss this
extensively.
... DaveBooth - Can get clarification from W3C Mgmt Team if
needed
<dbooth> See the charter: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/ws-arch-charter#email
<scribe_sg> DaveO - As an AC rep, I remember WSA
should have public architecural discussion. Now almost willing to
support WSA to be completely private
... DaveO - Lets follow the process else change it explicitly
... EricN - Not enough technical substance, merely a process to get
the document to reviewable shape
... Frank - agrees with Eric
... Katia - Agrees with Eric
... Hugo - spending technical time to discuss process
... DBooth - +1 Hugo
... MEPs discussion
... donMullen - need to coordinate various groups on MEPs; Arch
group has more traction on this than WSD
... DonMullen - contacted WSD folks and need WSA participation as
well
... DaveO - someone wants to do a task force?
... DaveO - There may be some operational questions related to a
Task Force
... DaveO - Who would be interested in this task force?
... MikeC - interested folks on this please start a discussion via
mail
... Heather - OASIS Management TC reforming as a "WS Management TC"
- WISDOM!
... Heather - Formulating Charter now, will be back in 45 days