IRC log of ws-cg on 2003-01-21

Timestamps are in UTC.

[MSM]

zakim, who is here?

[Zakim]

sorry, MSM, I don't know what conference this is

On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, MChapman, MSM, DaveH, DavidF

[DavidF]

zakim who is here?

[MSM]

zakim, this is wscg

[Zakim]

ok, MSM

[MSM]

zakim, who is here?

[Zakim]

On the phone I see ??P1, Michael, +1.415.229.aaaa, Dave_Hollander, Fallside

On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, MChapman, MSM, DaveH, DavidF

[MSM]

zakim, +1.415 is MChapman

[DavidF]

http://www.w3.org/2003/01/07-ws-cg-irc.html

ACTION: DF to invite Kelvin to next wscg telcon to report on OASIS/Securit/W3C co-ordination. [CONTINUED]

ACTION: DaveH to review status of description (metadata, etc) work at post-f2f CG call (note: try and schedule a joint session with RDF folks at TP) [PENDING]

ACTION: hugo to check status of xmlp charter and ensure it is renewed w/ an appropriate date

this action has been done

[DaveH]

zakim, ??P8 is steve

[DavidF]

suggested agenda 1. report on status of Choreog WG, 2. reports from XML CG and Semantic Web CG, 3. further advice for C14N for XMLP WG

1. report on Choreog WG ....

from Martin Chapman, Oracle

Oracle has promised much support

contemplating asking members to submit position papers for 1st f2f (Feb)

zakim, mute Steve

[Zakim]

Steve should now be muted

[DavidF]

zakim, unmute Steve

[Zakim]

Steve should no longer be muted

[DaveH]

two inputs to wg, wsci and wsa. wsci provides a good starting point. Eindhoven paper?

Martin, is there a pointer for the enidhoven papers?

[DavidF]

Steve and Martin thinking about starting with meta-model (Eindhoven paper)

[MChapman]

i will find a ref to the papers - pretty sure that they were sent to wsawg

[DavidF]

steve concerned that no users represented on the WG, how to recruit them?

2. reports from XML CG and Semantic Web CG .....

[DavidF]

3. further advice on C14N for XMLP WG ....

[MSM]

zakim, unmute Michael

[Zakim]

sorry, MSM, I do not see a party named 'Michael'

[MSM]

zakim, unmute MSM

[Zakim]

MSM should no longer be muted

[MSM]

DF: one question is where the work should be done: recharter/extend? new charter for new WG?

DF: the work was not really in the original charter ...

... but launching a new WG can take a long time

DF: perhaps the way to do it is to start drafting a new charter now ...

DH: there is also the issue of maintenance status

MC: is there interest and expertise in XMLP to do this?

DF: yes, but it may not be enough to attract people: if C14n is the only work item, I don't see a full WG

draft a new charter, put c14n in, maintenance, and see if other items fall into the list

if it doesn't reach critical mass, then treat it as maintenance under the existing charter

next meeting: Feb 4

[Zakim]

WS_WSCG()1:00PM has ended

[DavidF]

call participants think that the draft new charter see if it flies" approacj is reasonable

ACTION 3=

rrsagent, bye

[RRSAgent]

I see 3 open action items:

ACTION: DF to invite Kelvin to next wscg telcon to report on OASIS/Securit/W3C co-ordination. [CONTINUED] [1]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/01/21-ws-cg-irc#T18-09-46

ACTION: DaveH to review status of description (metadata, etc) work at post-f2f CG call (note: try and schedule a joint session with RDF folks at TP) [PENDING] [2]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/01/21-ws-cg-irc#T18-10-00

ACTION: [3]

recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/01/21-ws-cg-irc#T18-10-16

[DavidF]

zakim, bye