IRC log of ws-cg on 2003-05-13

Timestamps are in UTC.

[em]
zakim, this will be WS_CG
[Zakim]
I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled near this time, em
[em]
zakim, this will be WS
[Zakim]
ok, em, I see WS_WSCG()1:00PM already started
[em]
zakim, who is here?
[Zakim]
On the phone I see Fallside
On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, em, caribou, DavidF
[em]
zakim, dial emiller-bos
[Zakim]
ok, em; the call is being made
[em]
zakim, who is here?
[Zakim]
On the phone I see Fallside, Carine, Emiller, Hugo
On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, em, caribou, DavidF
[DavidF]
http://www.w3.org/2003/04/29-ws-cg-irc.html
action item review
[em]
http://www.w3.org/2003/04/29-ws-cg-actions
- WS WG chairs to poll their members for input to Schema on subset idea
(continued)
- MSM to send pointers about Schema and XML subsets
(completed)
- Jonathan to craft a proposal to better ensure appropriate resources are available to accomplish the RDF-WSDL mapping
[DavidF]
ACTION: WS WG chairs to poll their members for input to Schema on subset idea
ACTION: WS WG chairs to poll their members for input to XML Core on subset idea
ACTION: Jonathan to craft a proposal to better ensure appropriate resources are available to accomplish the RDF-WSDL mapping
ACTION: WSCG to track progress of SOAP12 in WSDL11 enviroment activities within XMLP and WSD WGs
[caribou]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws/2003Mar/0032.html
(Mike's email)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws/2003Mar/0017.html
[DavidF]
discussion about WSIG proposal ....
DF concerned about (1) overlap between WSIG and WSArch, (2) allocation of scarce resource to WSIG
((2) resources = w3 staff and members)
em makes WSIG and WSArch distinction in terms of 12mos out vs 6 mos out
[em]
... and more 'exploratory' in nature
[DavidF]
DF notes at beginning of call that not enough WS WG Chairs present to make any decisions .... hence telcon content spent on discussion
agreement to update charter to better reflect intended "exploratory" and "future" nature of IG
s/charter/draft charter/
em notes that process for the IG is very lightweight
much lighter than a WG
[caribou]
http://www.w3.org/2003/04/Process-20030417/tr.html#RecsPR
[Zakim]
WS_WSCG()1:00PM has ended
[DavidF]
DF suggests it would be useful to collect and id the groups/constituencies/members who are interested in the IG
rrsagent, bye
[RRSAgent]
I see 4 open action items:
ACTION: WS WG chairs to poll their members for input to Schema on subset idea [1]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/13-ws-cg-irc#T17-07-52
ACTION: WS WG chairs to poll their members for input to XML Core on subset idea [2]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/13-ws-cg-irc#T17-08-04
ACTION: Jonathan to craft a proposal to better ensure appropriate resources are available to accomplish the RDF-WSDL mapping [3]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/13-ws-cg-irc#T17-08-19
ACTION: WSCG to track progress of SOAP12 in WSDL11 enviroment activities within XMLP and WSD WGs [4]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2003/05/13-ws-cg-irc#T17-12-36