Web Services CG call
14 Oct 2003

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Contents

• Topics
  1. Review of action items
  2. WS WG reports
  3. Update from groups about the review of "Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security" as discussed on the 2003-09-16 call
• Summary of Action Items

<hugo> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-cg/2003Oct/0002.html

<ericm> ws-cg'ers sorry... will have to send last minute regrets for todays emeting
... will lurk on irc if needed

<davidF> thnx for the heads-up eric

Review of action items

<hugo> http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/cg/3/09/30-minutes.html#newActions

<hugo> ACTION: David to check about possibility of collocating a f2f with XML2003 [DONE]
... DavidF: XMLP will meet in San Francisco
... calendar updated: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/cg/2/03/schedule
... Discussing: WG Chairs to look at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-cg/2003Jul/0018.html and to response to Michael by Tuesday 7 October
... MSM: the results are as Martin desired

<hugo> ACTION: WG Chairs to look at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-cg/2003Jul/0018.html and to response to Michael by Tuesday 7 October [DONE]

<hugo> ACTION: ST to formally ask WSChor if they have any dependencies on Schema [IN PROGRESS]

WS WG reports

<hugo> -- XML CG
... See IRC log
... -- SWeb
... Skipped
... -- Choreography
... Martin: we have 2 proposals of language on the table
... ... we are working on merging them; however, there was a fiasco about announcing a private meeting which shouldn't have been done
... ... basically, if there are private meetings, then they should just happen privately
... -- XMLP
... David: still working on attachments
... ... reqs + use cases, as well as spec
... ... we have adopted the XML Query data model for this work
... ... there were issues about typing information, which are addressed by XML Query
... -- Architecture

<davidF> ... (from Hugo) came back from f2f with a large number of action items, now working thorugh them
... ... working on WS Management

Update from groups about the review of "Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security" as discussed on the 2003-09-16 call

<davidF> ... appoears that only XMLP reviewed it

<hugo> DavidF: there are 3 foundational specs, and 2 others
... ... we went through the big issues
... ... we will be sending our review this week
... ... the deadline is 19 October
... ... the spec is written with SOAP 1.1 in mind, and we think that it should be written with 1.2 in mind
... ... intermediaries need rework in our opinion

Summary of Action Items