See also: IRC log
agenda is approved
minutes will only be approved next meeting
minutes: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061113
<scribe> ACTION: EricP to add text gravy to his annotated Amazon WSDL and put it in Examples document [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action01]
discussing progress
action is done
<scribe> ACTION: Eric to add SPDL annotations to our example WSDLs [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action02]
ericP: in progress
jacekK: old action is closed, new opened
<JacekK> ACTION: Eric to upgrade the SPDL page for SAWSDL readers and then work things out with the Usage Guide [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: EricP to get feedback from XMLCore about attrExtensions element [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action04]
ericP: they are not considering to adopt it.
... probably canonicalisation wg will want it.
... this does not require xml core involvement
jacekK: do we run later in a problem with a namespace issue since it is currently in sawsdl namespace
old action is closed and jackK opened a new action
<JacekK> ACTION: EricP to create a SAWSDL-independent namespace for attrExtensions [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action05]
<scribe> ACTION: Editors to gather WSDL URIs and send them to Jack [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action06]
can be marked as done
<scribe> ACTION: TomasV to talk to SIOC people and find out if SAWSDL is usable there [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action07]
<scribe> ACTION: Jacek to coordinate with XML Schema Working Group whether we may emphasize (even in the title) that we annotate XML Schema. [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action08]
<scribe> ACTION: Rama and Amit to send suggestions for group page text (can reuse http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/projects/meteor-s/SAWSDL/ ) [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action09]
<scribe> ACTION: Jacek to provide text on why we need to combine SPARQL with the other technologies in one direction and not the other. [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action10]
<scribe> ACTION: Carlos to reply to SEE TC that WSMO capability should be on WSDL interface, therefore we wouldn't do service annotations, and see if they agree [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action11]
<scribe> ACTION: Carlos to respond to issue LC 9 to SEE TC as well [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action12]
jacekK: Carlos should CC the list when doing the actions
<scribe> ACTION: Rama to formulate a reply to self on LC issues 14, 15 and 16 and seek agreement from original commentators [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action13]
<scribe> ACTION: JacekK to summarize the implementations table into formalized CR criteria [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action14]
jacekK: are there still any known last call reviewers?
... probably xml scema still outstanding, other all received
jacekK: decision made to do only editorial changes
... waiting on actual wording, partly recorded as an action item
jacekK: no news on this
... we won't wait for this too long before moving on to CR
rama: this is implemented
jacekK: issue will be closed
rama: is done
jacekK: issue will be closed
rama: not sure what to do here, who will contribute?
jacekK: to contact originator and ask for input
<JacekK> ACTION: Jacek to contact Karthik about issue 32 for him to contribute examples for the usage guide [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action15]
rama: pending, would love additional input
<JacekK> ACTION: Rama to send an email asking for contributions for issue 33 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/minutes/20061121#action16]
claudio: issue 33 is of importance, having concrete work with HP
... having example is important for adoption of spec
jacekK: ordering of operation is described using ASMs in WSMO
... probably there are OWL-S examples existing
rama: what is with copyright?
jacekK: should not be a problem, if authors send email with cc to working group should be sufficient
rama: however it might happen that we need to daopt them to fit to current examples.
jacekK: AOB?