[PROPOSED] HTML Working Group Charter

The mission of the HTML Working Group, part of the HTML Activity , is to continue the development of the HTML language, as well as the development of ~~HTML-specific~~ APIs for interacting with in-memory representations of resources that use the HTML language, and to define normative requirements for browsers and other user agents which process HTML resources, along with defining normative document-conformance requirements for HTML documents.

End date	30 June 2015
Confidentiality	Proceedings are Public
Chairs	Sam Ruby, IBM Paul Cotton, Microsoft Maciej Stachowiak, Apple
Team Contacts	Michael[tm] Smith, W3C/Keio (0.5 FTE), Robin Berjon, W3C/MIT (Editor, 1.0 FTE)
Meetings	Teleconferences Up to one teleconference per week for general HTML Working Group business, and up to one teleconference per week each for any task forces or subteams, or for topic-specific discussions (for example, for the Testing Task Force, the Accessibility Task Force, or for discussions of the HTML Media Extensions proposals). Face-to-face meetings A two-day meeting during the W3C's annual Technical Plenary week; other additional F2F meetings for general HTML Working Group business may be scheduled (up to 2 per year). IRC discussion The #html-wg channel on irc.w3.org

Scope

The HTML Working Group will:

continue the development of the HTML language, in both of its concrete syntaxes: the text/html syntax (also known simply as the HTML syntax), and the XML syntax (also known as the XHTML syntax)
continue the development of ~~HTML-specific~~ APIs for interacting with in-memory representations of resources that use the HTML language ~~(with the exception of the HTML-specific APIs defined in the DOM4 specification)~~ , as well as extensions to those APIs
continue to define the basic execution and security models for JavaScript in the context of HTML documents
continue to define normative requirements for applications that process HTML resources, including (but not limited to) browsers and other interactive user agents, as well as authoring tools, markup generators, and conformance checkers

Consistent with the W3C’s Principles of Design , the HTML Working Group will use a greater reliance on modularity as a key part of the development of the HTML language, allowing extension specifications to define new elements, new attributes, new values for attributes that accept defined sets of keywords, and new APIs. Those extension specifications may be achieved within the HTML Working Group or other Groups.

Success Criteria

The HTML Working Group’s work will be considered a success if there are multiple independent complete and interoperable implementations of its deliverables that are widely used.

Production of stable documents addressing the work items listed in the Deliverables section.
Test suites for each deliverable with conformance criteria.
Availability of authoring tools and validation tools.
User-community and industry adoption of the group deliverables.
Availability of multiple, independent, interoperable browser implementations of each deliverable with normative conformance requirements for browser implementations, as demonstrated by an implementation report (summarizing implementation status against the relevant test suite).
If participants from fewer than three distinct browser-engine projects are participating in the group, its charter should be re-examined by the W3C.
It is also preferable to have multiple implementations of all testable products (conformance classes) for which normative conformance requirements are defined, but it is understood that for some conformance classes (for example, validators), multiple conformant implementations may not emerge.
Satisfy horizontal dependencies, whether by addressing these through extensions or by integration of solutions in the baseline specification; or, failing that, report which dependencies remain unsatisfied when moving to Last Call and beyond.

Deliverables

The HTML Working Group will complete work on the following existing deliverables of the group:

HTML5
HTML Microdata
HTML Canvas 2D Context
HTML5 diffs from HTML4
Public Identifiers for entity resolution in XHTML
Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents
HTML: The Markup Language (informative only)
HTML5: Edition for Web Authors (Working Group Note)

In addition, the HTML Working Group will complete the work on the DOM4 specification.

The HTML Working Group, jointly with the Protocols and Formats Working Group using the HTML Accessibility Task Force, will also complete work on the following existing deliverables:

HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives .
Note: the Group responsibility for this document will be revisited after existing differences have been resolved to the extent possible.
HTML to Platform Accessibility APIs Implementation Guide
Note: the Group responsibility for this document will be revisited given that it had already been a chartered deliverable of PFWG ~~, and is currently under joint development~~ .
~~Public Identifiers for entity resolution in XHTML~~ HTML5 Image Description Extension
Using WAI-ARIA in HTML

~~Polyglot Markup: HTML-Compatible XHTML Documents HTML: The Markup Language (informative only) HTML5: Edition for Web Authors (Working Group Note)~~

The HTML Working Group will deliver an HTML 5.1 specification which updates the HTML5 specification, and which, like the HTML5 specification:

defines the HTML language
defines HTML-specific APIs for interacting with in-memory representations of resources that use the HTML language
defines normative requirements for browsers and other user agents which process HTML resources

The updated HTML specification may be modularized into separate documents. When extensions to the HTML 5.0 or 5.1 specifications are needed, separate extension specifications can be written.

Some examples of features that would be in scope ~~for the updated HTML specification~~ :

additions to the HTMLMediaElement element interface, to support use cases such as live events or premium content; for example, additions for:
- facilitating adaptive streaming ( Media Source Extensions )
- supporting playback of protected content
adaptive images ( The srcset attribute , The picture element )
additions to the HTML Canvas 2D Context ( HTML Canvas 2D Context, Level 2 )
additional new elements and attributes for Web Components (the <content>, <decorator>, <element>, <shadow>, <template> elements)

Note: It is anticipated that work on the next-generation specification for offline Web applications will not be done by the HTML Working Group but will instead be done by the Web Applications Working Group.

Other Deliverables

The HTML Working Group will create a comprehensive test suite for the updated HTML5 specification to satisfy the CR Exit Criteria . Is is expected that the final test suite will be available no later than 3 months before moving to Proposed Recommendation.

Milestones

Milestones
Specification	FPWD	LC	CR	PR	Rec
Note: The group will document significant changes from this initial schedule on the group’s publication status page .
HTML5	N/A	2011 Q2	2012 Q4	2014 Q4	2014 Q4
HTML 5.1	2012 Q4	2014 Q3	2015 Q1	2016 Q4	2016 Q4
HTML Canvas 2D Context	N/A	2011 Q2	2012 Q4	2013 Q3	2013 Q4
HTML Microdata	N/A	2011 Q2	2013 Q1	2013 Q3	2013 Q4
Media Source Extensions	N/A	2013 Q4 Q3	2014 Q2	2015 Q1	2015 Q1

Dependencies and Liaisons

Dependencies

The HTML5 specification has normative dependencies on ARIA, SVG, MathML, and CSS specifications, and on a number for specifications that are deliverables of the Web Applications Working Group, including but not necessarily limited to the following:

~~DOM4~~
DOM3 Events
WebIDL
XMLHttpRequest
DOM Parsing and Serialization
URL API
Web Components: Shadow DOM, HTML Templates, Custom Elements

The HTML Working Group is expecting reviews from the following working groups:

HTML Accessibility Task Force: The objective of the HTML Accessibility TF is to identify the accessibility requirements and manage the progress of accessibility solutions in HTML5, while expanding participation and fostering collaboration between experts in HTML and Web Accessibility as a means to meet the requirements and goals of each group and to increase mutual understanding. The Task Force is a joint group between the HTML Working Group and the Protocols and Formats Working Group, and operates under its own work statement .
SVG Working Group: The HTML markup language includes support for embedding SVG content and provides support for graphics API, such as the 2D Context API.
Internationalization Working Group: The i18n Working Group looks at issues encompassing a broad array of cultural, linguistic, technical and accessibility concerns.
MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group: The HTML markup language provides support for the translate attribute.
Math Working Group: The HTML markup language includes support for embedding MathML content.
Web Applications Working Group: The HTML5 specification relies on several specifications from the Web Applications Working Group. The HTML Working Group now plans to complete the work on the DOM4 specification.
Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Working Group: The most common application of CSS is to style web pages written in the HTML language.
Web Application Security Working Group: The HTML5 specification is documenting some security policies mechanisms.
Protocols and Formats Working Group: PFWG develops the WAI-ARIA specification, of which the HTML5 specification has included some portions by mutual agreement. In addition, PFWG reviews W3C specifications while under development to ensure that they provide support for accessibility for people with disabilities.
RDFa Working Group: One deliverable of the RDFa Working Group is a specification that defines rules and guidelines for using RDFa in HTML documents.
Privacy Interest Group: The HTML specification defines features that have potential impact on user privacy.

Liaisons

The HTML Working Group should maintain a liaison with the following groups:

Community Groups , including but not limited to Web Hypertext Application Technology Community Group , Responsive Images Community Group and HTML Editing APIs Community Group .
WHATWG , a community of people interested in evolving HTML and related technologies.
Web and TV Interest Group , a forum for Web and TV technical discussions to identify requirements and potential solutions to ensure that the Web will function well with TV.

The HTML Working Group will consider proposals for future specifications from Community Groups, encourage open participation from Community Group members, and keep coordination with relevant Community Groups, all within the bounds of the W3C patent policy and available resources.

External Groups

The following is a list of external bodies the HTML Working Group should collaborate with:

ECMA Technical Committee 39 (TC39): The HTML Working Group should ensure that its work related to any APIs implemented in JavaScript/ECMAScript is aligned as much as is practical and reasonable with the work of TC39.
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF): The HTML Working Group should ensure that its work related to Web protocols is aligned as much as is practical and reasonable with IETF RFCs and BCPs.

Participation

The Chairs, specification editors, and test-suite maintainers are expected to contribute one to two days per week towards the HTML Working Group. There are no minimum requirements for other participants, and in particular no minimum requirements for “good standing”.

Communication

The group may hold teleconferences and face-to-face meetings, but note the Decision Policy requirements with regard to synchronous meetings.

Most of the technical work of the group will be done through discussions on the group’s public mailing lists and through bug discussions for bugs filed against the HTMLWG component in the W3C bugzilla service.

The following existing mailing lists are available for the HTML Working Group to use for discussions:

public-html (technical discussion list for the HTML Working Group)
public-html-admin (administrative discussion list for the HTML Working Group)
public-html-a11y (discussion list for the HTML Accessibility Task Force, a Joint HTML and PF Working Groups Task Force)
public-html-comments (discussion list for the group to receive public comments on its deliverables)
public-html-media (discussion list for proposed extensions to the HTMLMediaElement element interface)
public-html-testsuite (discussion list for the HTML Testing Task Force)
public-canvas-api (discussion list for the HTML Canvas 2D Context extension)

The group may also decide to add additional mailing lists, or to drop or repurpose existing ones. A complete list for current mailing lists is available.

Decision Policy

As explained in the W3C Process Document ( section 3.3 ), the HTML Working Group will seek to make decisions when there is consensus and with due process. The expectation is that typically, an editor or other participant makes an initial proposal, which is then refined in discussion with members of the group and other reviewers, and consensus emerges with little formal polling being required.

However, if a decision about an issue is necessary but consensus is not achieved after careful consideration of the range of views presented, the Chairs should put a question out to the group, poll the members of the group for responses (allowing for remote asynchronous participation—using, for example, mailing-list discussion and/or Web-based survey techniques , with a one-week minimum response time), and record a decision, along with any objections. In evaluation of responses, all members of the group will have equal footing; responses will be evaluated on the basis of their objective merit, and not on the basis of which particular members made the responses.

The group must not record any final decisions without first allowing for remote asynchronous participation in the decision—using, for example, mailing-list discussion and/or Web-based survey techniques. Specifically, the group must not record final decisions during synchronous meetings (telephone conferences or face-to-face meetings).

After the group has recorded a decision on an issue, the issue should then be considered resolved unless and until new information becomes available.

The group has been maintaining a detailed “ HTML Working Group Decision Policy ”. This continues to evolve based on the WGs experience over time, and may continue to do so to enhance the WGs operations in support of the principles of fairness, responsiveness, and progress of the W3C.

This charter is written in accordance with Section 3.4, Votes of the W3C Process Document and includes no voting procedures beyond what the Process Document requires.

Patent Policy

This Working Group operates under the W3C Patent Policy (5 February 2004 Version). To promote the widest adoption of Web standards, W3C seeks to issue Recommendations that can be implemented, according to this policy, on a Royalty-Free basis.

For more information about disclosure obligations for this group, please see the W3C Patent Policy Implementation .

Document License

The copyrights of HTML 5.0 and HTML 5.1 specifications produced by the HTML Working Group are licensed under the W3C Document License . ~~The Working Group may decide to use the W3C Open Document License for~~

When submitting an extension specification ~~if no objection is received at the first publication opportunity, or earlier if the Chairs call~~ to the ~~question. Individuals~~ Working Group, individuals may propose ~~to use the~~ that W3C ~~Document~~ publish the document under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License or (CC-BY) as well as the W3C ~~Open~~ Document License ~~when submitting an extension specification to the Working Group.~~ (Dual License). Extension specifications published under this Dual License may ~~republish~~ include materials that have been dropped from the HTML 5.0 and HTML 5.1 specifications but must not duplicate material included in these specifications. The ~~W3C Open Document License~~ DOM4 specification is also a candidate for the ~~Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY) or~~ Dual License.

When a ~~later version, unless W3C designates an alternate license~~ submitter proposes to use the Dual License, the Working Group decides to adopt the proposal either:

at the first publication opportunity (by using its usual publication process), or ~~licenses~~
sooner, if the Chairs call the question explicitly.

If there is an objection the group must not adopt the Dual License for that ~~would address all~~ document.

The title of an specification using the ~~HTML~~ Dual License must start with "W3C". Derivative works based on these specifications must :

not use ~~cases listed~~ "W3C" in ~~III. Use Cases . Copyright attribution should be given~~ their titles;
attribute the original specification to W3C (MIT, ERCIM, Keio, ~~Beihang),~~ Beihang); and ~~should~~
include a link to the original W3C document.

For questions about the relationship between derivative works of W3C specifications and the W3C Patent Policy, see our related FAQ .

About this Charter

This charter for the HTML Working Group has been created according to section 6.2 of the Process Document . In the event of a conflict between this document or the provisions of any charter and the W3C Process, the W3C Process shall take precedence.

The previous version of this charter is available.

$Id: ~~Overview.html,v 1.51 2013-05-01 18:56:26~~ html-charter.html,v 1.38 2013-09-27 18:42:00 plehegar Exp $