The Nordic Accessibility Community Group serves as an open forum to discuss challenges, network with accessibility professionals, and promote the importance of inclusive design in the Nordic countries.
Group's public email, repo and wiki activity over time
Note: Community Groups are proposed and run by the community. Although W3C hosts these
conversations, the groups do not necessarily represent the views of the W3C Membership or staff.
Chairs, when logged in, may publish draft and final reports. Please see report requirements.
Umut Gültekin, Robin Whittleton, Sander Nijsingh, Christer Janzon, Thomas Nielsen, Miia Kirsi, Erik Gustafsson Spagnoli.
Agenda
Discuss our approach: How can we benefit from researching, discussing, and learning about the differences and connections between EN 301 549 and WCAG?
Plan future efforts: What specific questions or areas should we prioritize in our study group?
Collaborate effectively: How can we ensure that our discussions contribute to the broader understanding of accessibility standards?
Whether you’ve been working with these standards for a while or are just beginning to explore them, we encourage everyone to join the discussion. This session will be a collaborative effort to outline the goals and methods of our study group, and your input will help shape the direction we take.
Robin: Unit measurement, inches vs cm, currency etc.
Very complex when two currencies needs to be displayed.
Color
High contrast, Dark mode are included in EN-standard.
If you fail Name, Role Value – why fail both that and EN 11.5.2.5 Object information?
Has any one compared reports from different countries?
In the Netherlands they test only for WCAG as of now and not the EN standard.
A lot harder demands on documents in Canada and assembly manuals for IKEA now needs ALT-texts (where they are today just images without translated texts).
Look at copies of tests from Nordic countries and compare. What do they fail and do they explain the fail and so on?
It would be great if we as a group could have a consensus on fails and non fails.
Additions to the differences in countries applying more for the EAA apart from the standard.
Set up a repo like the Netherlands.
How does the accessibility documentation (statements) look like in the different EU countries. Create a Github issue.
EN-standard updates, how do we keep track?
Conclusion
There’s a lot of uncertainty of different monitoring bodies in different countries. How to know where they are, how they will fail, what kind of documentation do they demand? There also seems to be differences in the accessibility community in views of what is included and not. Our main suggestion on going forward is to set up a Github repo so we all can share the effort of documenting, adding questions and discussing EN and WCAG topics for the Nordic countries. By this we will slowly but surely find a common ground on how to test, what to test and have a common place for information about monitoring.
Erik GS and Sander will set this up together and share with the rest of the group when we can start collaborating.
The discussion group format is a good way to discuss topics in a more focused manner.
What are the Nordic aspects of our group?
Open discussion about the purpose and objectives of this group:
We have had two purpose workshops in the past. Notes from the latest session: Purpose Workshop 2024
Tobias says he originally came for the opportunity to network with accessibility people in a structured way, not in a US time zone.
Is the purpose of this Community Group mainly networking?
We want to raise awareness of accessibility in the Nordics in general.
We have previously had success with our education and outreach group, pushing higher education to include accessibility in their curriculum.
Two purposes that Anne sees:
Ensure Nordic interests are represented in the different task-force groups at W3C. (E.g., WCAG, Maturity model, ACT, etc.)
We could do this by collectively writing public comments on the drafts.
Study groups could be helpful in figuring out how to best participate in W3C work groups.
It is suggested to have a talk about the EN 301 549 vs WCAG gaps and bridges.
How to structure a study group and its topics
One idea is to have two study groups per session that can discuss a topic (in breakout rooms) and present it in the larger group. For instance, a European Accessibility Act (EAA) discussion/roundtable session to see the different implementations and additions of the EAA in the Nordic countries is interesting.
To gauge the Community Group’s interest, we will create a vote on which topics people would be interested in discussing/studying:
ACT-rules
EN 301 549 interpretations, gaps, and bridges to WCAG
How are countries monitoring the EN standard apart from WCAG?
Contribution to the Accessibility Maturity Model
Accessibility in higher education
WCAG3
Tobias will set up a poll in Slack and link to it through the community email group.
Can we reach out to current W3C members in the Nordic?
There are 10 members in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden:
Aalto University
Agency for Digitalization
Criipto
ERICSSON
National Library of Sweden
Regional State Administrative Agency for Southern Finland
Siteimprove
Stiftelsen for internetinfrastruktur (IIS)
Tampere University
Whereby
How can we benefit from and contribute to W3C?
Simo: Been in the COGA group.
Anne: Previous W3 group experience has been more official with a specific task. More of a networking group as it feels now. Are there any demands from W3C in terms of using the brand for a networking group?
Stein-Erik: Get a start on the W3C groups. Is there a study group for how to participate better?
Last Tuesday, we hosted our second purpose workshop, a follow-up to the good session we had more than a year ago, in January 2023.
The goal was to refine our focus and bolster our sense of purpose as we strive to make an impact with accessibility across the Nordics.
We had a nice and engaging discussion, with many valuable suggestions on how to enhance our community’s activities. Key themes included:
Public talks, knowledge-sharing and presence: Several expressed interest in seeing us do more public talks and creating a stronger presence in the accessibility landscape.
Boosting physical interaction in the group: There’s a desire for more physical meetups and networking opportunities to strengthen our community bonds.
Meeting formats: We discussed the format of our meetings and the overarching purpose of our group. We will explore setting up other types of sessions and look to strengthen the ties between accessibility, the Nordics, and W3C.
Educational initiatives: A recurring theme was the importance of education, with ideas ranging from incorporating accessibility into school curricula to advocating for ACT rules in the Nordics.
New initiatives:
We’re excited to be introducing study groups and discussion groups—focused sessions where we can get deeper into specific topics. I’ll be helping to kickstart these groups and am looking forward to participating alongside many of you!
We will also continue with our retrospective-style sessions, so we can keep reflecting on our challenges and achievements together, and brainstorming future actions.
Community talks:
Our community talks have been a highlight, and we’re eager to keep the momentum going. We already have talks scheduled for later this month and August, but we’re on the lookout for speakers for future sessions. If you’re interested in giving a talk, please reach out!
For a detailed overview of the workshop and to see the full list of suggestions, check out the Purpose Workshop Document.
Thank you to everyone who participated and contributed their ideas. I look forward to continuing our good work and discussions together!
As co-chair of the Nordic Accessibility Community Group, I’m pleased to update you on our series of community talks.
These sessions are designed to deepen our understanding and enhance our practices around web accessibility, serving as a vital platform for both knowledge-sharing and professional development. Through these talks, we aim to equip our members and the broader community with the tools and insights needed to promote accessibility in digital environments effectively.
Reflections: Jean-Yves Moyen’s Insightful Session
Our series began with Jean-Yves Moyen’s talk on Tuesday, May 21st, titled “ACT: Towards Consistent Accessibility Conformance Testing”. Jean-Yves provided an in-depth look at the ACT Rules framework, emphasizing its importance for consistent accessibility testing. It was an enlightening session that covered the structure of the ACT ruleset, its application, and its benefits for creators, tool developers, and users.
Upcoming: Emma Dawson’s Presentation on Focus Management
We invite you to join us for the next talk featuring Emma Dawson, scheduled for Tuesday, June 18th at 14:00. Emma will address “Making Interactions More Accessible with Focus Management”. She will discuss practical techniques for improving feedback to keyboard and screen reader users, illustrated with examples from recent accessibility audits. This is an excellent opportunity to enhance your understanding of effective focus management in web accessibility; an all too often overlooked part of making digital experiences accessible.
Looking Ahead: Pär Lannerö’s Presentation on Spreading Accessibility Between Job Roles
Also, save the date for Thursday, August 15th, when Pär Lannerö will lead a session titled “Bread and Butter Accessibility”. This discussion will focus on how to distribute accessibility responsibilities across various roles within an organization and through different stages of the development process. The session will include a 15-minute presentation followed by a 20-minute discussion, promising valuable insights into incorporating accessibility into daily operations.
Invitation to Speak
If you have expertise in web accessibility and wish to contribute to our community, we would be glad to hear from you. Please consider sharing your knowledge by speaking at one of our future events. These talks are a vital way to ensure knowledge-sharing both within our group and to the broader community, supporting those who aim to improve their accessibility practices.
For more information about our talks and to get involved, please reach out to me or one of the other co-chairs.
On sept 19, 2023 I gave an insight into the state of digital accessibility in The Netherlands. Here’s a summary of this presentation.
Law and order
Since 2008 there has been a non-binding agreement between public organisations to be digitally accessible. As a foundation for this, there were the so-called “Web Guidelines”. These are basically WCAG 2.0 A and AA plus some extra requirements, such as friendly URLs.
These Web Guidelines have been superseded by a temporary conversion into national law of the Web Accessibility Directive. This temporary order will become part of a bigger Law on Digital Government. In the current order, there are no sanctions for not complying. This might change when the Law on Digital Government comes into force.
The European Accessibility Act has not yet been converted into national law.
Monitoring and dashboard
There is one monitoring body, Logius, which monitors the accessibility statements and helps public organisations with improving their digital accessibility. Their website is digitoegankelijk.nl.
All public organisations need to publish an accessibility statement in a fixed form with an online tool. All these statements are available at toegankelijkheidsverklaring.nl/register.
If you want to state that a website or app fully or partially complies to the Web Accessibility Directive, there must be a WCAG accessibility audit report as a foundation. This report is valid for 3 years.
An accessibility statement can have one of the following statuses:
E: no statement published.
D: no audit planned.
C: audit planned, but not yet done.
B: audit shows there are still some failures.
A: audit show conformance to the Web Accessibility Directive.
Right now the register of accessibility statements is being transferred into a dashboard: dashboard.digitoegankelijk.nl. This shows even more information about the state of accessibility at the Dutch government as a whole and per organisation.
WCAG audits
WCAG audits need to be done according to the evaluation method WCAG-EM. As a public organisation you can do it yourself, but this usually is outsourced.
It is possible to divide an audit into a technical audit and a content audit. In the technical audit, the auditor reviews 43 success criteria from a technical perspective. In a content audit, the auditor reviews 30 success criteria from a content perspective. There are some overlaps and these numbers are for WCAG 2.1 A+AA reports and will change for WCAG 2.2.
Miscellaneous
There is a national programme for help and support for public organisations.
Most – if not all – public organisations have accessibility as requirement in procurement.
If you are a web agency, designer or software builder and if you have proven that you can make digitally accessible products or services, you can apply to be listed on ddai.nl/aanbieders (Dutch Digital Accessibility Index). This is a commercial initiative for organisations that are looking for accessible suppliers.
Sheets
You can download the PowerPoint sheets from our Slack channel (I cannot upload it here). Please let me know if you run into any problems with this.
Thank you to everyone who participated in yesterday’s group meeting.
During the meeting, the three work groups presented their accomplishments from the past year:
The Knowledge-Sharing group, represented by Sander Nijsingh, discussed their decision to utilize the Nordic Accessibility Community Group Space on w3c.org for hosting shared documents temporarily. Sander also introduced the Speaker’s List, where members can indicate their availability for public speaking engagements related to accessibility, such as talks and workshops. The group also explored the idea of creating a list of accessibility events, although they noted that similar resources already exist online.
The Networking group, presented by Pär Lannerö, highlighted their practice of featuring a speaker during each group meeting. In the previous meeting, Daniel Dersén (founder of the W3C Nordic Chapter) spoke to the group from New York City. The group warmly welcomes all members to join their future meetings and talks. The next meeting is scheduled for September 19th at 14:00 CET. Sander Nijsingh will provide insights into accessibility in the Netherlands. You can access the meeting link here: Meeting Link (Microsoft Teams)
The Accessibility in Education group, represented by Tobias Christian Jensen, shared their progress in arranging interviews with Danish universities. All schools have shown interest in participating in 30-minute interviews over the next month. Those wishing to be part of these interview sessions can reach out to Tobias. Tobias also presented noteworthy findings from a prior survey conducted by the group. Key findings are summarized in this PowerPoint presentation: Accessibility in Education – Survey Results (PowerPoint)
Following the presentations, the community engaged in a retrospective session. Participants shared their thoughts and concerns under categories like “What went well,” “What didn’t go so well,” “What can we improve,” and “Other thoughts or questions.” The group voted on topics for further discussion, leading to the following outcomes:
The suggestion to transition to monthly community group meetings, promoting a lighter format resembling the retrospective. This would facilitate discussions about challenges, task assignments, and progress reviews since the last meeting, and the lighter format could foster more experimentation with the meetings and format. Members can also form work groups as needed. Additionally, efforts will be made to accommodate members to contribute in advance or after meetings for those unable to attend.
Addressing the uncertainty around joining individual work groups and what to expect from joining a work group. The decision was made to close the work groups’ Slack Channel, centralizing communication in the general Slack channel. New work group meetings will be sent out to the entire Community Group mailing list, allowing the members to decide if they wish to participate. A “How to Get Started” guide will be created for newcomers to the Community Group.
Expressing interest in arranging in-person gatherings for dinner or coffee. A Slack poll will be conducted to identify viable locations and suitable dates/times for such events.
Acknowledging time constraints and time zone challenges faced by some members. The revised meeting format aims to make sporadic attendance more feasible. A poll will also be conducted to identify preferred time zones for future meetings.
A commitment to setting clearer goals within the Community Group, providing direction for collective efforts. Clearly defined goals can also assist members in gaining support from their managers/organizations to participate in the Community Group.
The group has discussed adding accessibility to university curriculums but found this a big and challenging task.
Instead, we decided to start out by providing guest lecturing about accessibility to schools and gaining insight into what knowledge schools lack.
The group has created a list of schools, determining interest, and potentially arranging interviews with schools: Higher Education in Nordic Countries (Google Docs) The next step is to contact these schools to hear if they would be willing to be interviewed about challenges for getting accessibility on the curriculum, and determine whether they’d be willing to pay for guest lecturers coming to talk about accessibility.
The group has also published a survey for designers, developers, and others to gauge the general level of accessibility knowledge and training received: Accessibility Survey (Google Forms) Please share far and wide with your network.
Action items for our next meeting:
Review initial survey responses.
Discuss responses from the schools that have gotten back to us after we contact them.
Then, we will add contact information for each school.
Then, we will clear individual schools’ interests in having lectures on accessibility and determine if they are willing to pay for guest lectures.
We also plan to create a reusable presentation with a script/notes for guest lecturers to minimize workload.
Bonus: Potentially get in contact with employer panels that exist in university structures to push universities to focus more on accessibility.
For anyone interested in joining some of our meetings, you can let the Work Group Facilitator know, tell us in a comment here, or tell us in the Work Group Slack channel, and we will make sure to add you.
The meeting started with a round of presentations and a quick look at the events list and speaker directory.
Event list and speaker directory
These documents are not and will probably never be complete, so we’ll see how they evolve.
One interesting idea that was put forward in the meeting was to document not only upcoming events but also past events, with lists of speakers and topics, in order to provide inspiration for people who will be planning networking events. Especially events that have been recorded would be valuable to be able to find afterwards.
Experiences from 10 years of a11y meetups in Sweden
The main feature of the meeting was a presentation by Ida Franceen, founder and organizer of the T12T meetups. Usually held in Stockholm, but sometimes in other cities in Sweden – or online – these meetups have become very popular. The community today has about 2500 people in its mail list. The meetups usually gather 50-100 people, sometimes several hundred.
It is good to have a group of organizers (approx 5 persons seems to work well) so that the workload can be shared
Much easier to recruit speakers when you have a date set, and ask for a 10 or 15 minute talk than if date is vague and speakers are expected to speak for longer period.
Important to visit the venue before the event, so you know about physical accessibility and practical details, such as microphone availability et cetera.
DO NOT forget to leave time for people to actually meet and talk with each other! The meeting should not end when the last speaker finishes!
Tentative date for next meeting
June 20 at 15.00 CET.
Pär Lannerö volunteers to coordinate this meeting, too.
Here are the meeting notes from the Knowledge-sharing and Co-creating group meeting on March 27, 2023.
Speaker list
We’ve started with a blog post on this community group website with a list of speakers in a table. It’s good that this is publicly available in a tool that’s already being used. The layout is not the best, however. Sander will ask the administrators if there are options available here.
We’ve also discussed changing the layout within the blog post, i.e. not using one big table, but making sections per person and underneath each person a table or list with “Topic”, “Location”, “Speaker fee”, “Contact and additional info”.
An issue with this site is that only chairs can publish and edit blog posts and pages. Even the author of a blog post cannot edit it. Sander will ask the administrators if these rights can be changed. For now we’ve solved it by making a note that you can add a comment to the blog post or email Erik for changes.
Speakers should be aware that any info on this blog post is publicly available.
An alternative could be to set up a different website, for example hosted as a Github Page. This adds an extra layer of difficulty and another tool to be using. Not everybody is familiar with using Github and/or has an account.
Events list
First, we need to define what we want to show. If we only want to show accessibility events, then there are already great resources available. For example on the IAAP site. We could link to those. If we also want to list non-accessibility events, it would be hard to manage and to keep it updated.
A good alternative would be to write info by way of “I’m going to event [x] to talk about subject [y]”. That way each speaker can tell something from own experiences and this would not be too hard to manage (if any group member can edit this blog post).
Meeting notes
For meeting notes, this community group website is a great way to publish them. Please be aware that this is publicly available, so do not share any sensitive info, like passwords, in here.
Next meeting
We have not planned a new meeting yet. Please let me (Sander) know if you have any things you want to discuss. The easiest way to do that is to reach out to me in our Slack channel.
Here you can find a list of speakers to contact for talks on accessibility.
If you want to be added to this list, please leave a comment or send an email to [email protected] and we will add you to the list. Please note that this information is publicly available.
Name
Topic
Location / remote
Speaker fee (if applicable)
Contact information + Additional info
First name Last name
Introduction to accessibility, role-specific talks, etc.
City X or remote
Free for non-profit, contact for other organisations
• Introduction to accessibility • Implementing accessibility practices in an organization (change management) • Training in specific areas such as design (colors, interaction patterns, etc.) or development (WAI-aria, semantics, etc.) • Understanding of WCAG success criteria
Copenhagen or online are preferred, other places can be discussed.
• Accessibility for marketing professionals, UX, and content designers • Embedding accessibility into product development • Building communities of accessibility champions • Automated accessibility testing • Building a business case for accessibility • Legal requirements in EU
Copenhagen, Helsinki, or online. Other places can be discussed. Languages: Finnish, English
I do talks on disability, web accessibility, and WCAG, and I do workshops on evaluating and fixing web accessibility. I’d like to do more talks on why we should stop talking about the formalities of “web accessibility” (no, really) and focus on inclusive design.
